Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Sunday, April 19, 2026 at 1:45 PM
Ad

Another Child Sexual Assault Case on the Docket - Eisenhauer Pleads No Contest

Another Child Sexual Assault Case on the Docket - Eisenhauer Pleads No Contest
Adam J. Eisenhauer.

Author: Booking photo courtesy of Churchill County Sheriff’s Office.

Adam J. Eisenhauer appeared in the Tenth Judicial District Court before Judge Thomas Stockard for an arraignment on two charges related to the sexual assault of a child. Eisenhauer, who was present with Churchill County Public Defender Jacob Sommer, was arraigned on charges of (1) Sexual Assault on a Child Under the Age of 16, a Category A Felony that carries a penalty of life in prison after 25 years, and (2) Attempt to Commit Lewdness on a Child with a Child under the Age of 14, a Category B Felony punishable by 2-20 year in prison. In addition to prison sentences, a conviction also means lifetime supervision and sex offender registration.

Churchill County Public Defender Jacob Sommer told the court Eisenhauer was initially charged with ten similarly serious offenses. Sommer reported he met with Eisenhauer approximately 14 times to ensure his client had full access to all discovery material and he fully understood the evidence against him and the potential penalties for each charge.

Assistant District Attorney Jeffery Weed stated Eisenhauer was originally charged with six Category A Felonies (the most serious type of felonies) and three Category B felonies, all related to the sexual assault of a child, lewdness with a child, and child abuse. Weed said the state’s evidence showed on October 19, 2021, Eisenhauer sexually penetrated an 11-year-old minor through oral means. On the same date, Eisenhauer attempted to have the same child touch his genitals to cause arousal.

Plea negotiations resulted in eight dropped charges and two counts being prosecuted. Eisenhauer pled no contest per Alford to both charges. Judge Stockard explained to him that a no-contest plea is essentially a guilty plea from the court’s view. However, in an Alford plea, the defendant never admits guilt. Based on North Carolina v. Alford (1970), the Alford plea is the guilty acceptance of a crime, although the defendant claims innocence in the activity. The defendant accepts the full ramifications of a guilty verdict and the prescribed penalties without admitting to committing the crime.

According to Sommer, Eisenhauer has had contact no with the victim since his arrest and subsequent bail release. Additionally, the child named in the case has been removed from the mother’s home by DCFS, which is conducting an ongoing investigation.

Judge Stockard addressed Eisenhauer’s custodial status, as he is currently out on bail. ADA Weed expressed concern that Eisenhauer and the mother of the child victim were recently married and that she is currently pregnant. Weed also stated that the State believes Eisenhauer poses a potential flight risk simply because he was facing a sentence of 25 to life. In response, Stockard ordered Eisenhauer to be supervised by Court Services until sentencing, check in daily, and have no contact with the victim.

By Nevada statute, Sexual Assault of a Child Under the Age of 16 is non-probatable unless the defendant submits to a psychosexual evaluation and risk assessment. However, even with an assessment, the possibility of probation for Eisenhauer is unlikely if recently prosecuted child sexual assault cases in Churchill County serve as an indicator. The defense has not yet stated whether or not they plan to obtain an evaluation. Sentencing was set for August 16.

 

 

Sign up to receive updates and the Friday File email notices.

Support local, independent news – subscribe to The Fallon Post, your non-profit (501c3) online news source for all things Fallon.

The Fallon Post – 2040 Reno Hwy, #385, Fallon, Nevada 89406

 

 

 


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 1
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 2
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 3
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 4
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 5
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 6
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 7
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 8
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 9
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 10
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 11
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 12
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 13
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 14
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 15
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 16
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 17
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 18
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 1Page no. 1
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 2Page no. 2
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 3Page no. 3
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 4Page no. 4
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 5Page no. 5
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 6Page no. 6
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 7Page no. 7
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 8Page no. 8
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 9Page no. 9
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 10Page no. 10
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 11Page no. 11
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 12Page no. 12
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 13Page no. 13
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 14Page no. 14
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 15Page no. 15
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 16Page no. 16
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 17Page no. 17
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 18Page no. 18
COMMENTS
Comment author: BonnieComment text: Good Luck to all of you. I mean this sincerely. My family fought the Navy for years. My parents owned Horse Creek (Pat and Linda Dempsey). They strung them along for years until they had no financial choice but to accept and get out. My Dad even hauled water for the Snow ranch trying to stay afloat. May God bless you all. I truly pray it works out for you.Comment publication date: 3/28/26, 9:22 PMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family RanchComment author: Lynn JohnsonComment text: I remember your mother well; she was a lovely and kind woman. I loved hanging out at your home on Sheckler Road where she was always warm and welcoming.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 7:12 PMComment source: June Irene Manhire (Pendarvis), née DriggsComment author: EvaComment text: Grandpa, I find myself wondering about you every so often. I see glimpses of your face in the years worn onto my dad. It makes me feel more connected to you in some way. I remember the familiar kindness from you that I know in my dad. I would’ve really liked to have a good conversation. I only have a handful of memories with you, but you were loving, and you were kind. I wish I was able to say more. If I am someone to you, I hope I make you proud. Thank you Aunt for this sweet post.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 12:11 AMComment source: Obituary -- Randolph Floris Banovich C Comment author: RBCComment text: The Navy should reimburse the market cost of replacing the grazing land they are taking. Period.Comment publication date: 3/26/26, 10:38 AMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family Ranch
SUPPORT OUR WORK