Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Friday, April 17, 2026 at 11:03 AM
Ad

Probation for Rocky Wells: Alleged Law Enforcement Misdeeds, No Drug Charges Filed

Probation for Rocky Wells: Alleged Law Enforcement Misdeeds, No Drug Charges Filed
Rocky Wells. Photo courtesy of Churchill County Sheriff’s Office.

Rocky Emerson Wells, 45, appeared for sentencing on Tuesday, April 7, in the Tenth Judicial District Court in Fallon before Judge Thomas Stockard on Case 25-10DC-0946 for Ex-Felon Not to Possess a Firearm. Wells was granted probation on the Category B felony, punishable by 1-6 years in prison, which is not typically probational under current Nevada law. 

Wells’s case originated just over a year ago with his April 1, 2025, arrest. He appeared in New River Township Justice Court before Judge Benjamin Trotter two days later and was arraigned on felony and misdemeanor charges alleging drug possession, transport, and sales involving multiple controlled substances, including fentanyl, methamphetamine, heroin, cocaine, Suboxone, and methylphenidate. 

Investigators reported quantities consistent with personal use and distribution, including approximately 27 grams of cocaine, which elevates possession to transporting (which has a 28-gram threshold) into a more serious offense. Also, 30 fentanyl-laced “M30” pills commonly referred to as “Dirty 30s,” along with more than 3 pounds of marijuana and cannabis concentrate exceeding legal limits. 

Authorities also reported Wells had $5,841 in cash in his pocket at the time of arrest. Additional charges include possession of drug paraphernalia and two counts of allowing a child to be present during the commission of drug-related offenses, involving a one-year-old infant in a residence with access to controlled substances. Wells is also charged with a Category B felony of an ex-felon in possession of a firearm, with three firearms allegedly recovered.

Wells was released on his own recognizance by Judge Trotter under Court Services supervision, with bail set at $223,000, to be applied should Wells violate the conditions of his release. Wells waived his right to a Justice Court preliminary hearing on Oct. 2, 2025, and his case was bound over to the Tenth Judicial District Court.

The Criminal Complaint filed Oct. 3, 2025, in District Court alleged only that Wells possessed a Colt MKIII .357 Magnum revolver, a Tanfoglio Model E15 .22RL revolver, and a Switch gun 22 Magnum mini revolver, having a prior felony conviction for third-offense Domestic Battery. He pleaded no contest to the charge on Oct. 28, 2025. According to the clerk’s office, no Criminal Complaints relating to the other charges have been filed in District Court.

During last week’s sentencing hearing, Court Services Director Brenda Ingram reported that since his release, Wells had been drug tested randomly and produced 78 negative results. 

Deputy District Attorney Chelsea Sanford told the court that Wells “became a prohibited person from possessing a firearm” in 1999 when he received his first conviction for domestic battery. She explained that laws preventing felons from possession come down from the legislature, which questions a felon’s “poor judgment or dangerous behavior,” and that “a felony conviction is viewed as a demonstration that an individual cannot be trusted to handle firearms in a safe, lawful manner.”  

Sanford said Wells' criminal history shows “this is not the type of individual that is looking for self-protection; he is the one we need protection from.”  Sanford asked for a sentence of 24 to 72 months in prison, stating, “He has already shown he cannot be trusted and has poor judgment.”

Wells appeared with retained defense attorney Steve Evenson, who challenged the circumstances by which his client was found to be in possession of a firearm. “The state ignores the significant reasons why this matter ends up in front of you as it does. The misdeeds of law enforcement … are prolific, even by my standards, and would shock the conscience of this court if we spent time going into them in grave detail.”

Evenson said that it was in light of that this offense was chosen “to avoid a long, expensive, and protracted legal fight.” Regarding his criminal history, Evenson agreed his client “was raising some serious hell” up until about 2008. He noted Wells had an assault and battery in 2013 for which he received a suspended jail sentence, and a few years later, a charge of permitting a dog to chase “a domestic animal of some nature.” 

Evenson, who asked for probation, pointed out that Wells’ current charge came about twelve years later, a long time with no convictions. He noted that the defense does not feel that the harshest penalty under the law is appropriate and that Wells will exceed the expectations of everyone.

Wells told the Court he has been employed fabricating rebar for about eight months, and is hoping to be full-time employed there once this is over. He apologized to everyone for his actions.

He said he has been “real good” for the last year; his last felony conviction was in 2006; he has been with his wife for 17 years; and wants to be able to take care of his family. He told Judge Stockard, “I just messed up, and I admit to the court that I did.”

It was noted during proceedings that Wells in arrears on child support payments by $400,000. Judge Stockard placed Wells on probation for 36 months on a suspended prison sentence of 28-72 months and ordered him to obtain a substance abuse evaluation and follow all recommendations.

Although the charge of Ex-Felon Not to Possess a Firearm, a Category B felony, carries a prison sentence and rarely results in probation, Nevada law does allow for judicial discretion in sentencing. In practice, probation in such cases is uncommon and typically reflects factors beyond the face of the charge, including negotiated plea agreements, evidentiary challenges, or other case-specific circumstances. Given the seriousness of the offense and the defendant’s broader criminal history, a probationary outcome would not be considered typical and indicative of underlying legal or procedural considerations.

 

 

More about the author/authors:
Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 1
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 2
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 3
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 4
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 5
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 6
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 7
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 8
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 9
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 10
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 11
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 12
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 13
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 14
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 15
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 16
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 17
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 18
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 1Page no. 1
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 2Page no. 2
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 3Page no. 3
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 4Page no. 4
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 5Page no. 5
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 6Page no. 6
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 7Page no. 7
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 8Page no. 8
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 9Page no. 9
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 10Page no. 10
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 11Page no. 11
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 12Page no. 12
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 13Page no. 13
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 14Page no. 14
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 15Page no. 15
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 16Page no. 16
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 17Page no. 17
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 18Page no. 18
COMMENTS
Comment author: BonnieComment text: Good Luck to all of you. I mean this sincerely. My family fought the Navy for years. My parents owned Horse Creek (Pat and Linda Dempsey). They strung them along for years until they had no financial choice but to accept and get out. My Dad even hauled water for the Snow ranch trying to stay afloat. May God bless you all. I truly pray it works out for you.Comment publication date: 3/28/26, 9:22 PMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family RanchComment author: Lynn JohnsonComment text: I remember your mother well; she was a lovely and kind woman. I loved hanging out at your home on Sheckler Road where she was always warm and welcoming.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 7:12 PMComment source: June Irene Manhire (Pendarvis), née DriggsComment author: EvaComment text: Grandpa, I find myself wondering about you every so often. I see glimpses of your face in the years worn onto my dad. It makes me feel more connected to you in some way. I remember the familiar kindness from you that I know in my dad. I would’ve really liked to have a good conversation. I only have a handful of memories with you, but you were loving, and you were kind. I wish I was able to say more. If I am someone to you, I hope I make you proud. Thank you Aunt for this sweet post.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 12:11 AMComment source: Obituary -- Randolph Floris Banovich C Comment author: RBCComment text: The Navy should reimburse the market cost of replacing the grazing land they are taking. Period.Comment publication date: 3/26/26, 10:38 AMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family Ranch
SUPPORT OUR WORK