Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Saturday, April 4, 2026 at 12:49 PM

Two Time Convicted Sex Offender Sentenced - Chris Schneider Gets Ten to Life

Failing to provide law enforcement with his home address, he once again flunked sex offender registration 101.
Two Time Convicted Sex Offender Sentenced - Chris Schneider Gets Ten to Life
Christopher Schneider in District Attorney with Churchill County Public Defender, Jacob Sommer via District Court Zoom, with permission.

It all started in August of 2020.

More accurately, it began in 2011, when Christopher Michael Schneider appeared before the Third Judicial District Court in Lyon County on charges of Statutory Sexual Seduction - more commonly known as statutory rape.

Nevada law states that when an individual is over 18 years old and has any sexual penetration with a minor who is 14 or 15 and at least four years younger than the perpetrator, the crime is considered statutory sexual seduction. Schneider, who was 30 years old when convicted, received 24-60 months in the Nevada Department of Corrections.

Sometime after his release in 2013, Schneider made his way to Reno. By 2015, he racked up two additional felony convictions; uttering a forged instrument (like trying to pass a forged check or other fraudulent documents) and failing to meet sex offender registration requirements. He received two 16–48-month sentences in NDOC, which ran concurrently, and he was back on the streets in the spring of 2017.

Within three years, Schneider was back in a courtroom, only this time it was in Fallon. Failing to provide law enforcement with his home address, he once again flunked sex offender registration 101. According to his public defender at the time, Charles Woodman, Esq., his client was essentially homeless and had no fixed address. Released on his own recognizance, Schneider soon added to the charge against him by ignoring his obligation to appear in court on September 11, 2020. As a result, a bench warrant with a $40,000 cash-only bond was issued for felony Failure to Appear (FTA).

Schneider was not on the run for long. Back in custody by December, he had picked up yet another charge. This one, however, was far more serious. He had been accused of a Class A felony - sexual assault. Again.

According to court documents, on or about May 30 of 2020, at an Allen Road address, Schneider forced another person into sex against the will of the victim or under conditions in which the perpetrator knew that the victim was mental or physically capable of resisting or understand the nature of his conduct. The victim in the case was a female juvenile, 16 years old at the time.

In March of 2021, on the recommendation of his Public Defender Jacob Sommer, Schneider was sent to Lakes Crossing Center in Sparks, which provides forensic mental health services for the state. The psychiatric staff evaluated Schneider to determine if he met the competency requirements to stand trial.

Based on Lake Crossing’s recommendations, Schneider was deemed competent in November by Judge Thomas Stockard of the Tenth Judicial District Court, after which he was re-arraigned and pled guilty to the charge. Sommer provided the factual basis for the Court stating that his client, by penetration, sexually assaulted the victim who was mentally or physically incapable of resisting and reported that she was intoxicated when the incident occurred.

On Tuesday, February 22, and 450 days after being taken into custody on the assault charge, Schneider finally appeared for sentencing.

Proceedings moved quickly as the victim in the case elected not to provide victim impact testimony. Schneider declined to make any statements to the Court before judgment was pronounced. Neither defense counsel nor Assistant District Attorney Jeffery Weed made arguments, as Nevada statute sealed Schneider’s fate. He was going to prison.

Now 40 years old, the two-time convicted sex offender will spend at least a decade inside. As a repeat offender, that number is most likely a lot longer.

Judge Stockard sentenced Schneider to life in prison with the possibility of parole after ten years. All other charges were dismissed, and he was remanded back to the custody of the Churchill County Sheriff’s office for disposition of sentence.

 

 

 

 


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 1
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 2
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 3
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 4
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 5
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 6
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 7
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 8
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 9
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 10
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 11
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 12
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 13
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 14
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 15
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 16
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 17
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 18
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 1Page no. 1
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 2Page no. 2
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 3Page no. 3
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 4Page no. 4
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 5Page no. 5
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 6Page no. 6
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 7Page no. 7
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 8Page no. 8
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 9Page no. 9
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 10Page no. 10
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 11Page no. 11
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 12Page no. 12
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 13Page no. 13
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 14Page no. 14
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 15Page no. 15
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 16Page no. 16
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 17Page no. 17
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 18Page no. 18
COMMENTS
Comment author: BonnieComment text: Good Luck to all of you. I mean this sincerely. My family fought the Navy for years. My parents owned Horse Creek (Pat and Linda Dempsey). They strung them along for years until they had no financial choice but to accept and get out. My Dad even hauled water for the Snow ranch trying to stay afloat. May God bless you all. I truly pray it works out for you.Comment publication date: 3/28/26, 9:22 PMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family RanchComment author: Lynn JohnsonComment text: I remember your mother well; she was a lovely and kind woman. I loved hanging out at your home on Sheckler Road where she was always warm and welcoming.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 7:12 PMComment source: June Irene Manhire (Pendarvis), née DriggsComment author: EvaComment text: Grandpa, I find myself wondering about you every so often. I see glimpses of your face in the years worn onto my dad. It makes me feel more connected to you in some way. I remember the familiar kindness from you that I know in my dad. I would’ve really liked to have a good conversation. I only have a handful of memories with you, but you were loving, and you were kind. I wish I was able to say more. If I am someone to you, I hope I make you proud. Thank you Aunt for this sweet post.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 12:11 AMComment source: Obituary -- Randolph Floris Banovich C Comment author: RBCComment text: The Navy should reimburse the market cost of replacing the grazing land they are taking. Period.Comment publication date: 3/26/26, 10:38 AMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family Ranch
SUPPORT OUR WORK