Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Saturday, July 5, 2025 at 5:58 AM
Ad

Planning Department Proposes New Industrial Zoning Designations

Proposed updates to clarify industrial zoning in the county were presented to the Churchill County Planning Commission at its June 24 workshop. Randy Hines, public works director, said his department’s goals regarding the suggested changes were to provide more explanation and transparency for industrial uses in the future. The department proposes to split the industrial zone into subcategories referenced as I-1, I-2 and I-3. Currently, the county only has one industrial zone.

“With just one industrial zone throughout the county, you’re really stuck with requiring special use permits for almost everything that comes in the area,” Hines said.

I-1 zoning would cover light industrial uses like warehousing and indoor manufacturing with I-2 zoning for medium industrial uses like munitions and hazardous materials manufacturing. The I-3 zoning will be heavy industrial activities like explosives and chemical manufacturing. Hines said even with the new zoning designations, some special use permits will be necessary for higher-risk activities.

Hines presented proposed zoning tables and maps to the commission, with color-coded maps showing the separate industrial zones. He showed maps for Hazen, Leeteville Junction, Rattlesnake Hill area, and industrial lands on Highway 95N.

Planning commissioners reviewed the maps and provided initial feedback, pointing out certain parcels they felt should have different industrial zoning. Hines listened and said he wasn’t opposed to adjusting the proposed zoning designation and added they could even have a split zoning on one parcel if necessary.

County Manager Jim Barbee said when the National Defense Authorization Act was passed in 2022, the Navy’s lands expanded by 600,000 acres. Part of the county’s negotiations involved addressing the “checkerboard” parcels skirting the Interstate 80 corridor north of Hazen. The checkerboard refers to alternating private and public sections of land in that area. A section is approximately one mile square and normally contains 640 acres. Barbee said in the 1800s, when the railroads were blazed through the country, there was a 20-mile buffer on each side of the railroad—however, the federal government held onto much of that land, which created access issues for both private and public lands.

Barbee said the county received 14,000 acres of vacant land in direct conveyance from the federal government in exchange for the lands taken over by the B-20 bombing range expansion. Those lands are located near Interstate 80, by the airport and north of the sewage treatment plant, and are available for development, Barbee said.

Currently, if a privately held section of land sits at the top of a mountain and the owner wants to swap it for a federally held section on the valley floor—a more suitable place for industrial or commercial development—the owner must go through several lengthy state and federal review processes. Ideally, the federal lands would be consolidated to the mountaintops and unusable areas, leaving the valley floor for private ownership.

Churchill County created a land-swap process wherein they will “sit at the table between BLM and the private owner” to help aid owners of less-desirable mountaintop private sections become eligible for an exchange of valley floor sections.

“This workshop is to address the current industrial parcels as they sit today,” Hines emphasized. “We are not proposing any new parcels.”

The Planning Department will take comments on the proposed changes over the next couple of weeks. Hines said he will give an update at the July planning commission meeting, with its final presentation at the August meeting. Maps with the proposed industrial zoning changes are included in the agenda packet PDF for the June 24 meeting. Members of the public are welcome to email their comments to Hines at [email protected].

 

More about the author/authors:
Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 1
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 2
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 3
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 4
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 5
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 6
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 7
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 8
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 9
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 10
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 11
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 12
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 13
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 14
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 15
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 16
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 1Page no. 1
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 2Page no. 2
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 3Page no. 3
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 4Page no. 4
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 5Page no. 5
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 6Page no. 6
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 7Page no. 7
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 8Page no. 8
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 9Page no. 9
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 10Page no. 10
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 11Page no. 11
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 12Page no. 12
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 13Page no. 13
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 14Page no. 14
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 15Page no. 15
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 16Page no. 16
COMMENTS
Comment author: Mike HinzComment text: I knew Sam as a member of our church growing up. He always had a warm smile, a kind word, and a great sense of humor! He will be great missed!Comment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:57 AMComment source: Obituary -- Samuel Bruce WickizerComment author: Mike HinzComment text: Great teacher, great coach, but even a better person!!! Rest in peace Mr. BeachComment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:53 AMComment source: Obituary -- Jack Victor Beach, Jr.Comment author: Mike HinzComment text: I had Mrs Hedges for First Grade at Northside Elementary in 1969. I still, to this day, remember her as a wonderful teacher…one of my favorites!!Comment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:29 AMComment source: Obituary - Nancy Marie Hedges C Comment author: Carl C. HagenComment text: What are MFNs and PBMs ?? ............................ From the editor: This is a very good question and we apologize for not catching that wasn't in there. We reached out to the writer/submitter and got this info back...hope it's helpful. PBM: Pharmacy Benefit Managers are pharmacies that are owned by insurance companies. (CVS is one.) They negotiate with drug makers to get reduced pricing for medications, but they historically have not passed along those savings to patients. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/pharmacy-benefit-managers-staff-report.pdf MFN: Most Favored Nation pricing is a policy that means a country agrees to offer the same trade concessions (like tariffs or price reductions) to all member nations of the World Trade Organization (WTO). When applied to pharmaceuticals, it could disrupt global access, deter innovation, and obscure the deeper systemic issues in American health care. https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2025/05/22/the-global-risks-of-americas-most-favored-nation-drug-pricing-policy/Comment publication date: 6/23/25, 7:47 AMComment source: L E T T E R TO THE EDITOR
SUPPORT OUR WORK