Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Friday, May 1, 2026 at 2:57 PM
Ad

Planning Department Proposes New Industrial Zoning Designations

Proposed updates to clarify industrial zoning in the county were presented to the Churchill County Planning Commission at its June 24 workshop. Randy Hines, public works director, said his department’s goals regarding the suggested changes were to provide more explanation and transparency for industrial uses in the future. The department proposes to split the industrial zone into subcategories referenced as I-1, I-2 and I-3. Currently, the county only has one industrial zone.

“With just one industrial zone throughout the county, you’re really stuck with requiring special use permits for almost everything that comes in the area,” Hines said.

I-1 zoning would cover light industrial uses like warehousing and indoor manufacturing with I-2 zoning for medium industrial uses like munitions and hazardous materials manufacturing. The I-3 zoning will be heavy industrial activities like explosives and chemical manufacturing. Hines said even with the new zoning designations, some special use permits will be necessary for higher-risk activities.

Hines presented proposed zoning tables and maps to the commission, with color-coded maps showing the separate industrial zones. He showed maps for Hazen, Leeteville Junction, Rattlesnake Hill area, and industrial lands on Highway 95N.

Planning commissioners reviewed the maps and provided initial feedback, pointing out certain parcels they felt should have different industrial zoning. Hines listened and said he wasn’t opposed to adjusting the proposed zoning designation and added they could even have a split zoning on one parcel if necessary.

County Manager Jim Barbee said when the National Defense Authorization Act was passed in 2022, the Navy’s lands expanded by 600,000 acres. Part of the county’s negotiations involved addressing the “checkerboard” parcels skirting the Interstate 80 corridor north of Hazen. The checkerboard refers to alternating private and public sections of land in that area. A section is approximately one mile square and normally contains 640 acres. Barbee said in the 1800s, when the railroads were blazed through the country, there was a 20-mile buffer on each side of the railroad—however, the federal government held onto much of that land, which created access issues for both private and public lands.

Barbee said the county received 14,000 acres of vacant land in direct conveyance from the federal government in exchange for the lands taken over by the B-20 bombing range expansion. Those lands are located near Interstate 80, by the airport and north of the sewage treatment plant, and are available for development, Barbee said.

Currently, if a privately held section of land sits at the top of a mountain and the owner wants to swap it for a federally held section on the valley floor—a more suitable place for industrial or commercial development—the owner must go through several lengthy state and federal review processes. Ideally, the federal lands would be consolidated to the mountaintops and unusable areas, leaving the valley floor for private ownership.

Churchill County created a land-swap process wherein they will “sit at the table between BLM and the private owner” to help aid owners of less-desirable mountaintop private sections become eligible for an exchange of valley floor sections.

“This workshop is to address the current industrial parcels as they sit today,” Hines emphasized. “We are not proposing any new parcels.”

The Planning Department will take comments on the proposed changes over the next couple of weeks. Hines said he will give an update at the July planning commission meeting, with its final presentation at the August meeting. Maps with the proposed industrial zoning changes are included in the agenda packet PDF for the June 24 meeting. Members of the public are welcome to email their comments to Hines at [email protected].

 

More about the author/authors:
Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 1
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 2
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 3
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 4
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 5
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 6
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 7
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 8
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 9
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 10
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 11
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 12
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 13
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 14
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 15
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 16
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 17
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 18
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 1Page no. 1
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 2Page no. 2
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 3Page no. 3
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 4Page no. 4
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 5Page no. 5
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 6Page no. 6
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 7Page no. 7
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 8Page no. 8
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 9Page no. 9
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 10Page no. 10
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 11Page no. 11
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 12Page no. 12
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 13Page no. 13
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 14Page no. 14
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 15Page no. 15
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 16Page no. 16
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 17Page no. 17
May 1, 2026 - Fallon Recognized with Top Honor at  - page 18Page no. 18
COMMENTS
Comment author: Winnie DowlingComment text: So proud of Kelli Kelly. She is most definitely a collaborator and is very well known throughout the state for her assistance as a Nevada SBDC business advisor, especially related to agriculture and local food entrepreneurship and systems. Her spirit radiates! Winnie Dowling, State Director, Nevada SBDCComment publication date: 4/30/26, 1:41 PMComment source: Kelli Kelly Earns Statewide Entrepreneurial Spirit AwardComment author: Susan Clifford CopelandComment text: I am so sorry to hear this news. His mother, father, Karen and Trent were neighbors of ours in Tonopah, Nevada. We moved to Fallon first and then the Kroll's later moved there also. Mother and Wanda were good friends. My brother Michael and Trent were playmates in Tonopah. Mother and my three little children visited the family at their ranch in Fallon. My condolences to Frank's family. May you be comforted to know that I care and I pray you will be comforted by your memories of Frank. Sincerely,Comment publication date: 4/30/26, 11:51 AMComment source: Frank Robert KrollComment author: Debbie Getto SmithComment text: RIP Tammy. My prayers to your family and loved onesComment publication date: 4/29/26, 9:08 PMComment source: Tammy Kay (Moore) SlatonComment author: Marcos H. Lozoya Sr.Comment text: My condolences to the family. I remember Tammy as a woman of God always in the spirit of serving and loving all. I thank God I got to meet her. You will always be rememberedComment publication date: 4/29/26, 1:20 PMComment source: Tammy Kay (Moore) Slaton
SUPPORT OUR WORK