Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Saturday, June 21, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Ad

U.S. 395 Southern Sierra Corridor Study

Meetings to be held regarding proposed improvements of U.S. 395 between Carson City and the Nevada-California border at Topaz Lake.
U.S. 395 Southern Sierra Corridor Study
US Hwy 395 leading up toward Topaz Lake overlook.

Author: File photo.

NDOT will host in-person and virtual meetings to review existing corridor conditions and gather public feedback on U.S. 395 between Carson City and the Nevada-California border at Topaz Lake. 

In a recent five-year period, eleven lives were lost on this section of the highway. The study, projected to be completed in spring 2025, will develop goals, recommendations, and strategies to enhance roadway safety and use and provide decision-makers with guidance for potential corridor improvements in the future.

Visitors can view project information and provide comments by visiting the virtual public meeting at ndotus395.com anytime between October 23 and November 22, 2023. 
There will be a meeting held on Monday, November 6, between 4-7 p.m. at the Carson City Community Center Gym at 851 East Williams Street, with a second meeting on Wednesday, November 8, between 4-7 p.m. at the Douglas County Community and Senior Center at 1329 Waterloo Lane in Gardnerville. 

The formal project presentation will be live-streamed on November 8 at 5:30 p.m. via the NDOT Facebook page (@NevadaDOT). Livestream participants will be allowed to provide comments and ask questions. Comments can be submitted at the public meeting or via instructions provided during the virtual public meeting. 

For additional assistance with access to the meeting, you can contact (702) 232-5288 or email [email protected]
 


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 1
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 2
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 3
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 4
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 5
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 6
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 7
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 8
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 9
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 10
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 11
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 12
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 13
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 14
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 15
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 16
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 1Page no. 1
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 2Page no. 2
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 3Page no. 3
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 4Page no. 4
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 5Page no. 5
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 6Page no. 6
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 7Page no. 7
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 8Page no. 8
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 9Page no. 9
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 10Page no. 10
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 11Page no. 11
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 12Page no. 12
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 13Page no. 13
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 14Page no. 14
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 15Page no. 15
June 20, 2025 - Planning Commission denies Wood Pe - page 16Page no. 16
SUPPORT OUR WORK