Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Friday, April 17, 2026 at 9:40 PM
Ad

Local Man Accused of Sexual Assault Detained by ICE

Defense claims wife recanted in local sexual assault case
Local Man Accused of Sexual Assault Detained by ICE

Juan Perez-Santillan appeared in New River Township Justice Court on July 31 before Judge Benjamin Trotter for a status hearing on two Category A felony charges stemming from a July 19 incident at a residence south of Fallon.

The criminal complaint charges Perez-Santillan with Sexual Assault and Battery with Intent to Commit Sexual Assault, both punishable by life in prison with the possibility of parole after 10 years if the victim sustained no substantial bodily harm. If convicted, Perez-Santillan, who was arrested on July 19, would also be required to register as a sex offender and submit to lifetime supervision.

According to the allegations, Perez-Santillan forced himself upon his wife, against her will, using force or violence with the intent to sexually assault her. The complaint further states that Perez-Santillan grabbed her by the arms and struck her in the eye after she withdrew consent.

Defense attorney Charles Woodman urged the court to release Perez-Santillan on his own recognizance (OR), citing a recantation by the alleged victim, Monica Perez, stating he had serious concerns about the legitimacy of the charges.

Woodman told the court that Mrs. Perez was present in the courtroom and prepared to testify that the assault never occurred. According to Woodman, she had been hallucinating due to a combination of new medications and critically low sodium, potassium, and magnesium levels confirmed during a hospital stay. “She told me that this didn’t happen. It was all hallucination,” Woodman said, adding that she reported being confused for several days before and after the incident.

“I read this file, and I was shocked that he was arrested—more shocked that he was charged,” Woodman told the court. He said that Perez-Santillan had lived in Fallon since 1993, worked for the same ranch for 30 years, and had multiple family members, including his son and stepson, in court to support him.

Woodman also expressed concern about an immigration hold placed on his client and warned that federal authorities might remove Perez-Santillan before the charges could be addressed. “If ICE takes off with him, I have a feeling this case will absolutely evaporate,” he said.

Senior Deputy District Attorney Chelsea Sanford acknowledged the victim’s recantation but cautioned the court that such reversals are common in sexual assault cases and do not automatically nullify charges under Nevada law. “We are not like some states where a recantation ends the case,” Sanford said. “These are serious charges.”

Judge Trotter acknowledged Perez-Santillan’s local standing, lack of criminal history, and low likelihood that he posed a substantial risk to the victim or community if released. “I don’t have any reason to consider him a flight risk or a danger to the community,” Judge Trotter said, citing Perez-Santillan’s long-term residence and employment.

Trotter granted the OR release, lifting daily check-in requirements and a prior no-contact order, allowing Perez-Santillan to return home. Conditions of release included weekly contact with counsel, no new criminal violations, and appearance at all court hearings.

Despite the court-ordered release, Perez-Santillan was taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Aug. 2. According to the Churchill County Sheriff’s Office, ICE had placed a hold on Perez-Santillan prior to the hearing.

An ICE hold, formally known as an immigration detainer, is a request, not a legal mandate, for local law enforcement to notify ICE before releasing a defendant and to hold that person for up to 48 additional hours (excluding weekends and holidays) so that federal agents can take custody. Many counties in Nevada choose to honor these detainers.

Perez-Santillan did not appear for his Aug. 14 status and preliminary hearing, as he is believed to still be in ICE custody. Detained defendants are typically transferred to federal facilities and, in most cases, do not return for state prosecution. Although the case is not dismissed, it is often placed on inactive status, and further court proceedings are paused indefinitely.

More about the author/authors:
Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 1
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 2
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 3
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 4
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 5
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 6
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 7
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 8
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 9
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 10
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 11
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 12
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 13
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 14
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 15
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 16
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 17
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 18
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 1Page no. 1
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 2Page no. 2
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 3Page no. 3
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 4Page no. 4
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 5Page no. 5
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 6Page no. 6
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 7Page no. 7
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 8Page no. 8
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 9Page no. 9
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 10Page no. 10
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 11Page no. 11
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 12Page no. 12
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 13Page no. 13
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 14Page no. 14
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 15Page no. 15
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 16Page no. 16
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 17Page no. 17
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 18Page no. 18
COMMENTS
Comment author: BonnieComment text: Good Luck to all of you. I mean this sincerely. My family fought the Navy for years. My parents owned Horse Creek (Pat and Linda Dempsey). They strung them along for years until they had no financial choice but to accept and get out. My Dad even hauled water for the Snow ranch trying to stay afloat. May God bless you all. I truly pray it works out for you.Comment publication date: 3/28/26, 9:22 PMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family RanchComment author: Lynn JohnsonComment text: I remember your mother well; she was a lovely and kind woman. I loved hanging out at your home on Sheckler Road where she was always warm and welcoming.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 7:12 PMComment source: June Irene Manhire (Pendarvis), née DriggsComment author: EvaComment text: Grandpa, I find myself wondering about you every so often. I see glimpses of your face in the years worn onto my dad. It makes me feel more connected to you in some way. I remember the familiar kindness from you that I know in my dad. I would’ve really liked to have a good conversation. I only have a handful of memories with you, but you were loving, and you were kind. I wish I was able to say more. If I am someone to you, I hope I make you proud. Thank you Aunt for this sweet post.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 12:11 AMComment source: Obituary -- Randolph Floris Banovich C Comment author: RBCComment text: The Navy should reimburse the market cost of replacing the grazing land they are taking. Period.Comment publication date: 3/26/26, 10:38 AMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family Ranch
SUPPORT OUR WORK