Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Saturday, July 12, 2025 at 4:02 AM

Wood Pellet Proposal Tabled, Planning Commission Sets June Zoning Workshop

After a lengthy discussion and disagreement over how or whether the operation could be reasonably regulated, commissioners voted unanimously to table the SUP until the June meeting!!!
Wood Pellet Proposal Tabled, Planning Commission Sets June Zoning Workshop

A controversial proposal to convert a vacant grain facility on McLean Road into a wood pellet processing plant was tabled by the Churchill County Planning Commission during the regular May meeting, following extensive public opposition and concern over zoning compatibility, environmental impacts, and neighborhood disruption. 

Local entrepreneur Alex Peden had applied for a special use permit (SUP) and a similar-use determination to operate what he described as a one-man, low-volume operation using existing infrastructure at the site. Peden plans to use wood chips and sawdust to create heating pellets in a highly automated facility, arguing that the small-scale nature of the business closely mirrors crop processing already allowed in agricultural zones. 

Planning staff presented a lengthy report noting that the proposed use straddles the line between timber and crop processing. The decision to allow the facility as a temporary “similar use” could provide a path for Peden to prove the concept with limited impact, but would require tight restrictions—no additional employees, no increase in processing capacity, and annual reviews. 

Residents from the surrounding agricultural and residential neighborhoods raised sharp concerns during public comment. Speakers pointed to potential declines in air quality, property values, and quality of life. Several argued that the proposed 24/7 operations, even with insulated equipment, would introduce unacceptable noise and industrial activity into a rural, quiet area. Others questioned the validity of comparing wood pellet production to crop processing, urging the commission to hold firm on existing zoning. 

After a lengthy discussion and disagreement over how or whether the operation could be reasonably regulated, commissioners voted unanimously to table the SUP until the June meeting. Commissioner Tammy Edgmon made the motion, emphasizing the need for more time and clarity before moving forward. 

The planning commission also announced a joint workshop with the Churchill County Commission, scheduled for June 24, to review proposed changes to the county’s industrial zoning categories and use tables. Planning Director Randy Hines said the revisions will help create clearer distinctions between industrial uses like light manufacturing, logistics, and heavy industry and help prevent future zoning conflicts like the wood pellet proposal. 

The updated code will include three industrial zones (I-1, I-2, I-3) and clarified definitions and placement guidelines for each. Notification letters will be sent to all industrial property owners, and the public is invited to participate in the workshop process. 

In other business, the commission unanimously approved a special use permit for IRG Realty Advisors to expand their transloading and warehouse facility at the Port of Nevada off Reno Highway. The project includes a new 238,680 square-foot warehouse and associated parking, designed to accommodate large-scale freight and logistics operations. 

Representatives from IRG emphasized their track record with similar intermodal facilities nationwide and noted that this expansion would serve as a speculative build to attract potential tenants. The facility is part of the broader Inland Port project on the Churchill/Lyon county line just west of Hazen, which has been steadily building out infrastructure since its initial approval. 

 

 

 

 


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

COMMENTS
Comment author: Mike HinzComment text: I knew Sam as a member of our church growing up. He always had a warm smile, a kind word, and a great sense of humor! He will be great missed!Comment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:57 AMComment source: Obituary -- Samuel Bruce WickizerComment author: Mike HinzComment text: Great teacher, great coach, but even a better person!!! Rest in peace Mr. BeachComment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:53 AMComment source: Obituary -- Jack Victor Beach, Jr.Comment author: Mike HinzComment text: I had Mrs Hedges for First Grade at Northside Elementary in 1969. I still, to this day, remember her as a wonderful teacher…one of my favorites!!Comment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:29 AMComment source: Obituary - Nancy Marie Hedges C Comment author: Carl C. HagenComment text: What are MFNs and PBMs ?? ............................ From the editor: This is a very good question and we apologize for not catching that wasn't in there. We reached out to the writer/submitter and got this info back...hope it's helpful. PBM: Pharmacy Benefit Managers are pharmacies that are owned by insurance companies. (CVS is one.) They negotiate with drug makers to get reduced pricing for medications, but they historically have not passed along those savings to patients. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/pharmacy-benefit-managers-staff-report.pdf MFN: Most Favored Nation pricing is a policy that means a country agrees to offer the same trade concessions (like tariffs or price reductions) to all member nations of the World Trade Organization (WTO). When applied to pharmaceuticals, it could disrupt global access, deter innovation, and obscure the deeper systemic issues in American health care. https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2025/05/22/the-global-risks-of-americas-most-favored-nation-drug-pricing-policy/Comment publication date: 6/23/25, 7:47 AMComment source: L E T T E R TO THE EDITOR
SUPPORT OUR WORK