Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Saturday, April 18, 2026 at 10:07 AM
Ad

Wood Pellet Proposal Tabled, Planning Commission Sets June Zoning Workshop

After a lengthy discussion and disagreement over how or whether the operation could be reasonably regulated, commissioners voted unanimously to table the SUP until the June meeting!!!
Wood Pellet Proposal Tabled, Planning Commission Sets June Zoning Workshop

A controversial proposal to convert a vacant grain facility on McLean Road into a wood pellet processing plant was tabled by the Churchill County Planning Commission during the regular May meeting, following extensive public opposition and concern over zoning compatibility, environmental impacts, and neighborhood disruption. 

Local entrepreneur Alex Peden had applied for a special use permit (SUP) and a similar-use determination to operate what he described as a one-man, low-volume operation using existing infrastructure at the site. Peden plans to use wood chips and sawdust to create heating pellets in a highly automated facility, arguing that the small-scale nature of the business closely mirrors crop processing already allowed in agricultural zones. 

Planning staff presented a lengthy report noting that the proposed use straddles the line between timber and crop processing. The decision to allow the facility as a temporary “similar use” could provide a path for Peden to prove the concept with limited impact, but would require tight restrictions—no additional employees, no increase in processing capacity, and annual reviews. 

Residents from the surrounding agricultural and residential neighborhoods raised sharp concerns during public comment. Speakers pointed to potential declines in air quality, property values, and quality of life. Several argued that the proposed 24/7 operations, even with insulated equipment, would introduce unacceptable noise and industrial activity into a rural, quiet area. Others questioned the validity of comparing wood pellet production to crop processing, urging the commission to hold firm on existing zoning. 

After a lengthy discussion and disagreement over how or whether the operation could be reasonably regulated, commissioners voted unanimously to table the SUP until the June meeting. Commissioner Tammy Edgmon made the motion, emphasizing the need for more time and clarity before moving forward. 

The planning commission also announced a joint workshop with the Churchill County Commission, scheduled for June 24, to review proposed changes to the county’s industrial zoning categories and use tables. Planning Director Randy Hines said the revisions will help create clearer distinctions between industrial uses like light manufacturing, logistics, and heavy industry and help prevent future zoning conflicts like the wood pellet proposal. 

The updated code will include three industrial zones (I-1, I-2, I-3) and clarified definitions and placement guidelines for each. Notification letters will be sent to all industrial property owners, and the public is invited to participate in the workshop process. 

In other business, the commission unanimously approved a special use permit for IRG Realty Advisors to expand their transloading and warehouse facility at the Port of Nevada off Reno Highway. The project includes a new 238,680 square-foot warehouse and associated parking, designed to accommodate large-scale freight and logistics operations. 

Representatives from IRG emphasized their track record with similar intermodal facilities nationwide and noted that this expansion would serve as a speculative build to attract potential tenants. The facility is part of the broader Inland Port project on the Churchill/Lyon county line just west of Hazen, which has been steadily building out infrastructure since its initial approval. 

 

 

 

 


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 1
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 2
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 3
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 4
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 5
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 6
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 7
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 8
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 9
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 10
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 11
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 12
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 13
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 14
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 15
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 16
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 17
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 18
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 1Page no. 1
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 2Page no. 2
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 3Page no. 3
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 4Page no. 4
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 5Page no. 5
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 6Page no. 6
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 7Page no. 7
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 8Page no. 8
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 9Page no. 9
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 10Page no. 10
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 11Page no. 11
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 12Page no. 12
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 13Page no. 13
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 14Page no. 14
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 15Page no. 15
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 16Page no. 16
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 17Page no. 17
April 17, 2026 -Churchill County Mourns the Loss o - page 18Page no. 18
COMMENTS
Comment author: BonnieComment text: Good Luck to all of you. I mean this sincerely. My family fought the Navy for years. My parents owned Horse Creek (Pat and Linda Dempsey). They strung them along for years until they had no financial choice but to accept and get out. My Dad even hauled water for the Snow ranch trying to stay afloat. May God bless you all. I truly pray it works out for you.Comment publication date: 3/28/26, 9:22 PMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family RanchComment author: Lynn JohnsonComment text: I remember your mother well; she was a lovely and kind woman. I loved hanging out at your home on Sheckler Road where she was always warm and welcoming.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 7:12 PMComment source: June Irene Manhire (Pendarvis), née DriggsComment author: EvaComment text: Grandpa, I find myself wondering about you every so often. I see glimpses of your face in the years worn onto my dad. It makes me feel more connected to you in some way. I remember the familiar kindness from you that I know in my dad. I would’ve really liked to have a good conversation. I only have a handful of memories with you, but you were loving, and you were kind. I wish I was able to say more. If I am someone to you, I hope I make you proud. Thank you Aunt for this sweet post.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 12:11 AMComment source: Obituary -- Randolph Floris Banovich C Comment author: RBCComment text: The Navy should reimburse the market cost of replacing the grazing land they are taking. Period.Comment publication date: 3/26/26, 10:38 AMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family Ranch
SUPPORT OUR WORK