Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Friday, February 6, 2026 at 6:42 AM

Settlement Conference Set in Ashley Battery Cases

Settlement Conference Set in Ashley Battery Cases

On Feb. 7, Nicholas Pierre Ashley, in custody, appeared in the Tenth Judicial District Court for a status hearing before Judge Thomas Stockard.

In December, Ashley pleaded not guilty to the Category D Felony of Battery Causing Substantial Bodily Harm to a Victim, which Constitutes Domestic Violence, and to Battery by a Probationer, Parolee, or a Prisoner in Lawful Custody. At that time, a trial was set for July 14-18 and an evidentiary hearing for June 10.

Churchill County Public Defender Jacob Sommer requested a Criminal Settlement Conference before the trial. A settlement conference allows the state and the defense to present their cases to an out-of-district senior district court judge. If the matter is not resolved, the case will proceed to trial.

Sommer requested a bail reduction or for Ashley to be released on his own recognizance (OR), noting, "he has been in custody since sometime last year and has had no issues." Further, Sommer stated, "Ashley has significant community connections, no prior Failure to Appear charges; and the alleged victim is now living in California."

Deputy District Attorney Priscilla Baker cited the defendant's criminal history, which includes multiple DUIs, resisting arrest, assault on an officer, domestic battery, lewdness, sexual assault on a minor, and failure to register as a sex offender. She alleged that while Ashley was on parole, "he met up with the victim, a relationship ensued, and he then spent two or three days beating her." Baker stated the victim was "beaten to the point where her eyes were shut, she had a lump on her head …" Baker asked to admit some photos into evidence.

Sommer objected, stating, "Getting into this allegation that there were several days of beating is inconsistent with the charge we have, additionally I believe it is inconsistent with the facts we have."

Baker argued that the information was relevant, noting that it came out at the Preliminary Hearing during testimony. She further argued for bail to remain unchanged, stating, "This defendant is a huge flight risk. He faces some serious charges. And we have the safety of the victim."

Judge Stockard ruled, "I'm going to allow this to be marked; and I'll give them [the photos] the weight that I think it deserves." He continued the matter and set a bail hearing discussion for Feb. 18. Stockard then asked Ashley several questions and ordered an updated risk assessment to be completed by Feb. 14. The settlement conference will be scheduled administratively. 

 

 

More about the author/authors:
Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 1
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 2
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 3
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 4
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 5
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 6
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 7
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 8
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 9
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 10
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 11
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 12
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 13
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 14
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 15
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 16
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 17
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 18
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 1Page no. 1
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 2Page no. 2
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 3Page no. 3
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 4Page no. 4
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 5Page no. 5
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 6Page no. 6
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 7Page no. 7
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 8Page no. 8
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 9Page no. 9
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 10Page no. 10
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 11Page no. 11
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 12Page no. 12
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 13Page no. 13
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 14Page no. 14
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 15Page no. 15
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 16Page no. 16
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 17Page no. 17
February 6, 2026 - Judge Stockard Files for Distri - page 18Page no. 18
SUPPORT OUR WORK