Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Saturday, April 4, 2026 at 6:45 PM

Churchill County Seeks Proposals for Casey Road Property

Churchill County Seeks Proposals for Casey Road Property

Churchill County Commissioners are looking for development proposals for the property at 2255 Casey Road. During their recent meeting, commissioners approved issuing a request for proposals (RFP) to find a developer who can transform the cleared site into something that benefits the local economy.

Joe Sanford, assistant civil deputy district attorney, shared a brief history of the property. The county purchased the land in 2023, when it was occupied by run-down and uninhabitable mobile homes. In 2024, officials sought economic development proposals and entered a purchase agreement with Best Development Group for a hotel project that included cleaning up the site. However, the developer withdrew during the feasibility period, and the county completed the cleanup, removing all dilapidated structures.

The new RFP seeks developers interested in the property west of Walmart. While the county prefers a project such as a hotel or motel, other ideas that align with the community’s needs will be considered. Submitted proposals will be reviewed and scored before being presented to the board for approval.

County Manager Jim Barbee noted the property’s location could work well with adjacent land. A neighboring 14-acre property is currently for sale, and Barbee said combining parcels could open the door to larger projects. “We now have a much cleaner entrance into our community,” he said.

Churchill County Commissioners also held a public hearing to approve the county’s water dedication rules. The new ordinance simplifies the requirements and adds and allows for developers to make payments instead of dedicating water rights. Currently, water requirements vary depending on the type of development: rural parcels require 2.0 acre-feet of surface water per parcel; higher-density single-family homes require 1.12 acre-feet of groundwater per residence; and multi-family dwellings require between 0.56 and 1.12 acre-feet of groundwater per residence, depending on density.

These requirements often make larger projects more expensive. The updated rules aim to give developers more flexibility while ensuring the county maintains adequate water resources. Payments made instead of water dedication will go toward acquiring water rights for the county’s water bank. “The goal is to streamline the process and give developers more certainty about water availability and costs,” Sanford explained.

Commissioners also approved posting an RFP to hire a health authority for the Churchill County Adult Detention Facility and Juvenile Detention Facility. The county is seeking qualified or licensed healthcare providers to provide medical care and medication management for individuals in custody at both facilities. The new approach reduces prior requirements, focusing on weekday outpatient services instead of 24/7 on-call availability.

Deputy District Attorney Jeff Weed said the need for a new health authority arose after the departure of the provider at the juvenile detention center and rising concerns about the long-term availability of the current physician for adult detainees. The county hopes to control costs while meeting medical needs by scaling back the scope of services. Similar contracts last year ranged from $600,000 to $754,000 annually.

Proposals will be reviewed in the coming months, with a decision expected by April. The contract will initially run for one year with automatic renewal unless terminated or renegotiated.

 

 

More about the author/authors:
Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 1
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 2
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 3
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 4
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 5
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 6
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 7
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 8
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 9
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 10
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 11
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 12
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 13
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 14
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 15
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 16
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 17
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 18
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 1Page no. 1
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 2Page no. 2
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 3Page no. 3
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 4Page no. 4
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 5Page no. 5
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 6Page no. 6
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 7Page no. 7
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 8Page no. 8
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 9Page no. 9
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 10Page no. 10
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 11Page no. 11
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 12Page no. 12
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 13Page no. 13
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 14Page no. 14
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 15Page no. 15
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 16Page no. 16
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 17Page no. 17
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 18Page no. 18
COMMENTS
Comment author: BonnieComment text: Good Luck to all of you. I mean this sincerely. My family fought the Navy for years. My parents owned Horse Creek (Pat and Linda Dempsey). They strung them along for years until they had no financial choice but to accept and get out. My Dad even hauled water for the Snow ranch trying to stay afloat. May God bless you all. I truly pray it works out for you.Comment publication date: 3/28/26, 9:22 PMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family RanchComment author: Lynn JohnsonComment text: I remember your mother well; she was a lovely and kind woman. I loved hanging out at your home on Sheckler Road where she was always warm and welcoming.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 7:12 PMComment source: June Irene Manhire (Pendarvis), née DriggsComment author: EvaComment text: Grandpa, I find myself wondering about you every so often. I see glimpses of your face in the years worn onto my dad. It makes me feel more connected to you in some way. I remember the familiar kindness from you that I know in my dad. I would’ve really liked to have a good conversation. I only have a handful of memories with you, but you were loving, and you were kind. I wish I was able to say more. If I am someone to you, I hope I make you proud. Thank you Aunt for this sweet post.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 12:11 AMComment source: Obituary -- Randolph Floris Banovich C Comment author: RBCComment text: The Navy should reimburse the market cost of replacing the grazing land they are taking. Period.Comment publication date: 3/26/26, 10:38 AMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family Ranch
SUPPORT OUR WORK