Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Wednesday, April 1, 2026 at 6:11 PM

Nevada Vested Water Rights Must Now Be Claimed

Nevada Vested Water Rights Must Now Be Claimed
Lahontan Reservoir, 2023. Photo by Leanna Lehman.

On Jan. 9, 2026, the Central Nevada Water Authority board held a meeting to discuss claims of vested water rights. Jeff Fontaine, staff representative for Central Nevada Regional Water Authority, presented new state law requirements for formally claiming vested water rights.

According to Fontaine, vested water rights are “rights for water that were put to beneficial use or were used prior to the enactment of water laws in the state of Nevada.” In Nevada, laws were enacted in 1905 for springs and streams, in 1913 for artesian wells, and in 1939 for all groundwater. 

A change in state law now requires these vested water rights to be formally claimed, rather than relying solely on historic or assumed use. If a claim is not filed, the right can be challenged, lose priority, or potentially be lost altogether. 

According to information found in the background materials provided with agenda documents, “Any claimant of a pre-statutory water right must submit proof of the water use to the Nevada State Engineer on or before December 31, 2027, pursuant to NRS 533.087. If a claimant fails to submit such proof by the deadline, the claim is deemed abandoned.”

Additionally, the background information said that “Domestic wells used for household purposes are exempt from many water right requirements under Nevada law. Proof of Appropriation for domestic wells will not be required unless specifically requested by the Nevada Division of Water Resources.”

Claims must document location, source of water, type of usage, and proof that the usage existed before laws were made. Fontaine suggested filing claims sooner rather than later to avoid a possible rush before the deadline, saying, “There are lots of opportunities for participation if you file the vested claim to make your voice known.”

 


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

COMMENTS
Comment author: BonnieComment text: Good Luck to all of you. I mean this sincerely. My family fought the Navy for years. My parents owned Horse Creek (Pat and Linda Dempsey). They strung them along for years until they had no financial choice but to accept and get out. My Dad even hauled water for the Snow ranch trying to stay afloat. May God bless you all. I truly pray it works out for you.Comment publication date: 3/28/26, 9:22 PMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family RanchComment author: Lynn JohnsonComment text: I remember your mother well; she was a lovely and kind woman. I loved hanging out at your home on Sheckler Road where she was always warm and welcoming.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 7:12 PMComment source: June Irene Manhire (Pendarvis), née DriggsComment author: EvaComment text: Grandpa, I find myself wondering about you every so often. I see glimpses of your face in the years worn onto my dad. It makes me feel more connected to you in some way. I remember the familiar kindness from you that I know in my dad. I would’ve really liked to have a good conversation. I only have a handful of memories with you, but you were loving, and you were kind. I wish I was able to say more. If I am someone to you, I hope I make you proud. Thank you Aunt for this sweet post.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 12:11 AMComment source: Obituary -- Randolph Floris Banovich C Comment author: RBCComment text: The Navy should reimburse the market cost of replacing the grazing land they are taking. Period.Comment publication date: 3/26/26, 10:38 AMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family Ranch
SUPPORT OUR WORK