Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Sunday, April 5, 2026 at 6:30 AM

Sheriff’s Office to Get E-911 System Upgrade

Sheriff’s Office to Get E-911 System Upgrade
File photo.

The Churchill County E-911 Committee’s meeting on December 3 focused on two longstanding challenges for the county’s emergency communications system: ensuring all required carriers contribute to the E-911 fund and determining how to modernize the 911 infrastructure without overextending local budgets. 

The agenda called for members to approve funding for three new 911 servers for the Sheriff’s Office at a cost of $63,352, as part of the county’s ongoing efforts to upgrade its communications center to Next Generation 911 (NG911) capabilities.

During the last meeting held on June 13, 2024, Churchill County Comptroller Sherry Wideman reported an E-911 fund balance of $231,803, with the fund generating roughly $80,000 annually. General Manager Mark Feest questioned whether all companies providing phone service in the county are consistently submitting the required per-line fee, noting the fund report only reflects outflows.

Feest asked how the county confirms which carriers are paying in, how often they submit payments, and whether those contributions align with the estimated number of phone lines in Churchill County. “I think, for the committee, it is important that we look at this information to see who is paying in and, at least, give it a sniff test on whether this sounds correct,” he said. He added that the rise of VoIP systems makes it difficult to know whether all providers with customers in the county are accurately remitting fees.

Wideman said payments arrive unpredictably and are routed through the Clerk/Treasurer’s Office, but she receives forms from various companies, including some from out of state. She told the committee she could provide a listing of deposits for review. Members agreed that gaining a clearer picture of who pays into the fund—and whether contributions match expected per-capita averages—would help determine if revenue is being lost.

The committee then shifted to a broader discussion about future technological needs. Undersheriff Bill Lawry outlined the high cost and complexity of upgrading to a full NG911 system. Initial estimates approached $1 million, with Motorola’s proposal alone priced at approximately $817,000, payable over five years. “We do not generate $207,000 a year,” Lawry said, noting that the county currently operates on an Enhanced 911 system that works but lacks several modern capabilities.

Lawry described compatibility challenges between the county’s current system and newer management systems. He also noted uncertainty about whether outside vendors can support the county’s existing latitude-and-longitude-based call routing.

Committee members agreed at the June 2024 meeting that an independent evaluation was needed to determine realistic upgrade paths. After discussion, Feest made a motion “to identify third parties who can do an evaluation and provide us with a quote for such evaluation.”

Logically, a managed security and IT solution provider that offers server and infrastructure management confirmed the need for a system upgrade and submitted a $63,352 quote outlining a statement of work and a multiphase plan for servers, hardware installation, and remote assistance.

While the county will eventually need to consider the costly NG911 full system upgrade necessary to meet the demands of modern emergency services management, the committee approved the $63,352 purchase, with funding to come from the E-911 account.

 

 

More about the author/authors:
Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 1
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 2
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 3
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 4
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 5
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 6
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 7
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 8
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 9
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 10
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 11
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 12
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 13
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 14
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 15
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 16
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 17
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 18
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 1Page no. 1
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 2Page no. 2
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 3Page no. 3
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 4Page no. 4
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 5Page no. 5
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 6Page no. 6
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 7Page no. 7
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 8Page no. 8
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 9Page no. 9
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 10Page no. 10
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 11Page no. 11
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 12Page no. 12
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 13Page no. 13
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 14Page no. 14
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 15Page no. 15
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 16Page no. 16
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 17Page no. 17
April 3, 2026- Blake Cooper Voted Superintendent C - page 18Page no. 18
COMMENTS
Comment author: BonnieComment text: Good Luck to all of you. I mean this sincerely. My family fought the Navy for years. My parents owned Horse Creek (Pat and Linda Dempsey). They strung them along for years until they had no financial choice but to accept and get out. My Dad even hauled water for the Snow ranch trying to stay afloat. May God bless you all. I truly pray it works out for you.Comment publication date: 3/28/26, 9:22 PMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family RanchComment author: Lynn JohnsonComment text: I remember your mother well; she was a lovely and kind woman. I loved hanging out at your home on Sheckler Road where she was always warm and welcoming.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 7:12 PMComment source: June Irene Manhire (Pendarvis), née DriggsComment author: EvaComment text: Grandpa, I find myself wondering about you every so often. I see glimpses of your face in the years worn onto my dad. It makes me feel more connected to you in some way. I remember the familiar kindness from you that I know in my dad. I would’ve really liked to have a good conversation. I only have a handful of memories with you, but you were loving, and you were kind. I wish I was able to say more. If I am someone to you, I hope I make you proud. Thank you Aunt for this sweet post.Comment publication date: 3/27/26, 12:11 AMComment source: Obituary -- Randolph Floris Banovich C Comment author: RBCComment text: The Navy should reimburse the market cost of replacing the grazing land they are taking. Period.Comment publication date: 3/26/26, 10:38 AMComment source: Local Rancher Says Navy Land Expansion is Devastating His Family Ranch
SUPPORT OUR WORK