Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Saturday, July 5, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Ad

Battle for the Badge – Nick Dondero Ordered to Vacate Office of Esmeralda County Sheriff

Nick Dondero was an officer with Fallon Police Department and two nearby tribal agencies for 2-3 years before being convicted of misdemeanor domestic battery in Churchill County in 2007. Dondero was elected Esmeralda County Sheriff in 2022.
Battle for the Badge – Nick Dondero Ordered to Vacate Office of Esmeralda County Sheriff
Photo by Leanna Lehman.

Update: Esmeralda County Commissioner Mary Jane Zakas has added an item to the May 6 Board of Commissioners meeting agenda to discuss — and potentially approve — continuing to pay former Sheriff Nick Dondero’s salary for an additional 14 months, extending through the 2025–2026 fiscal year.

Additionally, Mineral County Sheriff Bill Ferguson offered to assist Esmeralda County through a Memorandum of Understanding while a long-term solution was developed. Despite that offer, commissioners appointed Deputy Sheriff Julian Melendez as interim sheriff, though he currently resides in California.

In a tense Esmeralda County Commission meeting last week, a local resident asked the question, “How can we trust a sheriff who never qualified to be one?” Around her, neighbors shifted in their seats—some nodding in agreement, others crossing their arms. Outside the building, rumors swirled that Sheriff Nick Dondero, despite a sealed domestic battery conviction and lack of peace officer certification, continued to carry a firearm and wear the badge.

That moment captured what had been simmering for more than a year: a battle over trust, law, transparency, and legitimacy. And last week, the Nevada Supreme Court ended the speculation.

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Nicholas Dondero is unlawfully holding the office of Sheriff of Esmeralda County, and that he shall be immediately ousted and altogether excluded therefrom.”

So reads the ruling issued by the Nevada Supreme Court, ordering Esmeralda County Sheriff Nick Dondero to vacate office following a protracted legal battle over his eligibility to serve.

The decision stems from a writ of quo warranto issued by Fifth Judicial District Judge Kimberly Wanker and a writ of mandamus brought by Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford. Together, the rulings conclude that Dondero failed to meet peace officer certification requirements and was further disqualified due to a prior domestic violence conviction.

On April 1, the Nevada Supreme Court overturned Wanker’s 2024 denial of summary judgment, which had blocked the state’s effort to remove Dondero from office. In their Order Granting Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, Justices Pickering, Cadish, and Lee wrote:

“Under the circumstances here, where the State argues that the material facts are undisputed and that the district court erroneously interpreted and applied the governing law, we elect to consider the State's petition.”

A writ of mandamus compels a government official, agency, or lower court to perform a legal duty. In Dondero’s case, it was used to force compliance with the state law requiring sheriff certification through Nevada POST (Peace Officer Standards and Training). In simple terms: the court said, You don’t get to opt out of this. It’s the law.

Despite the high court’s ruling, and as April 21, Dondero had not stepped down. Esmeralda County commissioners voted on April 15 to support him and pursue an appeal—potentially to the U.S. Supreme Court. The move followed a heated public meeting filled with sharp divisions over the sheriff’s leadership.

The state’s argument hinged on two key facts: Dondero never earned POST certification within the one-year timeframe required under NRS 289.555(1)(b), and he holds a disqualifying 2007 conviction for misdemeanor domestic battery.

But in a January 2024 district court hearing, the issue of POST certification became tangled in unusual reasoning—led not by Dondero’s defense, but by the bench itself. Judge Wanker took the lead in arguing that POST was to blame for Dondero’s lack of certification, a position later echoed by Dondero’s counsel, Augustus Claus, and Nye County Chief Deputy District Attorney Brian Kunzi, who represented Esmeralda County after its district attorney, Bob Glennon, conflicted off the case.

The Supreme Court rejected that framing.

Court documents filed April 22, 2025, confirm that Dondero never applied for POST certification—a fact corroborated by POST Executive Director Mike Sherlock. According to Sherlock, even if Dondero had applied after receiving POST’s August 2023 letter stating he was ineligible for certification, there would not have been enough time to complete the required training before the Jan. 2, 2024, deadline.

“Indeed, the record reflects that Dondero never applied for POST certification, either before or after receiving this letter, despite having the opportunity to do so,” continued the justices.

The second barrier to Dondero’s eligibility was his 2007 domestic battery conviction, which was sealed in 2016. But under Senate Bill 225, passed in 2023, individuals with such convictions are barred from serving as peace officers—even if the record is sealed.

“Sometimes, it is possible for people to slip through that fence because the conviction has been sealed,” said Sen. Dallas Harris, the bill’s sponsor. “That hole will be closed in this bill.”

The court noted that the authenticity of Dondero’s 2007 judgment of conviction, in which he pleaded no contest, was not disputed.

Dondero remains a dividing figure in Esmeralda County. To some, he’s a no-nonsense sheriff with rural roots and a blunt style. To others, he’s a man who never should have worn the badge—a candidate who campaigned hard but ignored the rules that come with the job. Concerns about concealed weapon permits and his sealed record have followed him since early in his tenure.

But for now, the state’s highest court has spoken: Nick Dondero no longer holds the office of sheriff—lawfully or otherwise.

In text photos by Leanna Lehman. 

More about the author/authors:
Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

This needs to end, Dondero needs and his deputies need to go. 04/25/2025 04:00 PM
The county got what they wanted. And now they are having to deal with it. They don’t have anyone they can appoint that would be a good Sheriff. Anyone that works there now, was hired by Dondero and should not be working there since they are working for someone that is not a certified Sheriff. The goods one left before or just after he took office because they didn’t want to be caught up in this.

July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 1
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 2
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 3
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 4
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 5
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 6
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 7
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 8
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 9
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 10
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 11
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 12
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 13
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 14
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 15
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 16
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 1Page no. 1
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 2Page no. 2
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 3Page no. 3
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 4Page no. 4
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 5Page no. 5
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 6Page no. 6
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 7Page no. 7
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 8Page no. 8
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 9Page no. 9
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 10Page no. 10
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 11Page no. 11
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 12Page no. 12
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 13Page no. 13
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 14Page no. 14
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 15Page no. 15
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 16Page no. 16
COMMENTS
Comment author: Mike HinzComment text: I knew Sam as a member of our church growing up. He always had a warm smile, a kind word, and a great sense of humor! He will be great missed!Comment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:57 AMComment source: Obituary -- Samuel Bruce WickizerComment author: Mike HinzComment text: Great teacher, great coach, but even a better person!!! Rest in peace Mr. BeachComment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:53 AMComment source: Obituary -- Jack Victor Beach, Jr.Comment author: Mike HinzComment text: I had Mrs Hedges for First Grade at Northside Elementary in 1969. I still, to this day, remember her as a wonderful teacher…one of my favorites!!Comment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:29 AMComment source: Obituary - Nancy Marie Hedges C Comment author: Carl C. HagenComment text: What are MFNs and PBMs ?? ............................ From the editor: This is a very good question and we apologize for not catching that wasn't in there. We reached out to the writer/submitter and got this info back...hope it's helpful. PBM: Pharmacy Benefit Managers are pharmacies that are owned by insurance companies. (CVS is one.) They negotiate with drug makers to get reduced pricing for medications, but they historically have not passed along those savings to patients. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/pharmacy-benefit-managers-staff-report.pdf MFN: Most Favored Nation pricing is a policy that means a country agrees to offer the same trade concessions (like tariffs or price reductions) to all member nations of the World Trade Organization (WTO). When applied to pharmaceuticals, it could disrupt global access, deter innovation, and obscure the deeper systemic issues in American health care. https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2025/05/22/the-global-risks-of-americas-most-favored-nation-drug-pricing-policy/Comment publication date: 6/23/25, 7:47 AMComment source: L E T T E R TO THE EDITOR
SUPPORT OUR WORK